Can we consider performance metrics to be accurate if they are based strictly on financial statements?
There is no universal methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of mergers and acquisitions. Can we consider performance metrics to be accurate if they are based strictly on financial statements? Unfortunately, no, because these indicators do not take into account the cost of capital of the company, as well as do not allow judging the achievement of the main goal of any company, namely, increasing its value. In addition, financial statement data can be subject to various interpretations/processes and therefore may not reflect the real financial condition of the company. The choice of valuation method directly depends on the type of synergy to be assessed.
There are various approaches which emphasize the need to estimate risk in the analysis of synergies. This is due to the probability of resetting the synergistic effect due to the high level of risk. Thus, the world practice has developed two main approaches to assess the effectiveness of M&A: qualitative and quantitative. The essence of these approaches is to measure the effectiveness of the merger as a whole, i.e., the total value of assets, gross sales for a certain period; analysis of the financial condition and financial performance of the management company and specific participants of the merged structure and the effectiveness of individual units of the merged structure.
Quantitative methods are divided into prospective (evaluation of the M&A transaction before it has been done) and retrospective (evaluation of the M&A transaction after it has been done).
Qualitative evaluation methods are typically used at the initial stage of planning and the search for acquisition candidates for enterprise integration. Among qualitative evaluation methods, the most popular are: SWOT-analysis, STEP-analysis, Porter’s 5 competitive forces; General Electric-McKinsey matrix and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix.
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of M&A transactions, it is recommended to use several methods simultaneously at different stages of the transaction. The right combination of approaches will allow for the neutralization of certain weaknesses of individual approaches.
The results of the analysis of the internal state of the company and the state of the external environment will allow evaluation of the compliance of the company’s capabilities with the market demands.
Image by freepik
The path to innovation is laden with unique and often substantial cost drivers that set these ventures apart from their more conventional counterparts. To handle these costs effectively, you need to understand them clearly and plan your finances and resources carefully.
At a later stage we will provide a series of postings on how to build and maintain your company’s dashboard. Most importantly, we cover how to use it. The most eloquent dashboard does no good if it is not properly used.
As a Management Team, you need to make the dashboard the central point of engagement.
If your startup is getting acquisition interest, congratulations! But should you sell to a private equity firm or a strategic buyer? Private equity (PE) firms and strategic buyers have fundamentally different financial approaches to M&A. This is because of their contrasting goals, investment strategies, and operational priorities.