Can we consider performance metrics to be accurate if they are based strictly on financial statements?
There is no universal methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of mergers and acquisitions. Can we consider performance metrics to be accurate if they are based strictly on financial statements? Unfortunately, no, because these indicators do not take into account the cost of capital of the company, as well as do not allow judging the achievement of the main goal of any company, namely, increasing its value. In addition, financial statement data can be subject to various interpretations/processes and therefore may not reflect the real financial condition of the company. The choice of valuation method directly depends on the type of synergy to be assessed.
There are various approaches which emphasize the need to estimate risk in the analysis of synergies. This is due to the probability of resetting the synergistic effect due to the high level of risk. Thus, the world practice has developed two main approaches to assess the effectiveness of M&A: qualitative and quantitative. The essence of these approaches is to measure the effectiveness of the merger as a whole, i.e., the total value of assets, gross sales for a certain period; analysis of the financial condition and financial performance of the management company and specific participants of the merged structure and the effectiveness of individual units of the merged structure.
Quantitative methods are divided into prospective (evaluation of the M&A transaction before it has been done) and retrospective (evaluation of the M&A transaction after it has been done).
Qualitative evaluation methods are typically used at the initial stage of planning and the search for acquisition candidates for enterprise integration. Among qualitative evaluation methods, the most popular are: SWOT-analysis, STEP-analysis, Porter’s 5 competitive forces; General Electric-McKinsey matrix and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix.
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of M&A transactions, it is recommended to use several methods simultaneously at different stages of the transaction. The right combination of approaches will allow for the neutralization of certain weaknesses of individual approaches.
The results of the analysis of the internal state of the company and the state of the external environment will allow evaluation of the compliance of the company’s capabilities with the market demands.
Image by freepik
The semiconductor industry has shaped the modern world in ways few industries ever have. From powering consumer electronics and enabling artificial intelligence to transforming healthcare, automotive systems, communications, and defense technologies, semiconductors remain at the core of global technological progress.
When you’re pitching to VCs, the trap is to sound like every other founder with slides on “market size” and “team.” That’s noise. In most cases, investors care less about technical complexity itself and more about what makes your technology unique, and why competitors won’t be able to copy it easily.
When people talk about “pillars of fundraising,” they often assume there’s one universal list. However, there is no single universal set of pillars in fundraising. Different fundraising experts describe different four-pillar models, each with its own logic and purpose.