Common Seller’s Mistakes In M&A Deal

Business professionals collaborating on a strategic business plan to drive success.

Selling a business or involving a financial partner is often a life-changing, one-time transaction for many sellers. It is important to prepare competently and thoroughly for the transaction to increase the value of the company and avoid discounting the price. We take a look at the common mistakes that sellers often make in M&A transactions:

1. Unpreparedness for the deal.

Any transaction requires thorough preparation.  At this stage, it is important to analyze the market, conduct an extensive audit of the target company, assess and work through the potential risks in order to close the agreement on the most favorable terms. The preparatory stage usually takes several months, but can take longer if restructuring is involved.

2. Failure to understand the real terms of the agreement.

Failure to understand the actual timing of the agreement can harm the seller. If the seller rushes to sell their asset, they risk getting a lower price for it or making mistakes that will take even longer to correct. Conversely, if the seller delays the process, there is an increased likelihood that the agreement will fail. A good and tightly managed schedule is paramount to a successful execution.

3. Lack of good communication between the parties.

The seller should research his acquirer thoroughly and have a realistic idea of the price for the asset being sold and arguments as to why his company should be priced that way. The seller’s position should be based on credible financial projections and realistic expectations.

4. Incompetently drafted NDAs.

When an investor enters into negotiations, he asks for information about the business, the disclosure of which without a non-disclosure agreement may cause a loss of competitive advantage or lead to losses. Especially if the buyer of the company is a strategic competitor.

5. Incorrect attitudes to human resources issues.

Even rumors of an impending sale can provoke the departure of top employees. Depending on the size of the company, such departures can lead to a significant loss in value and can even lead to the cancellation of the deal.

6. Financial advisor rejection or inconsistency in terms of their terms of service.

A financial adviser takes on a huge amount of responsibility – from finding buyers to assessing the synergies achieved after the deal is completed. An experienced financial advisor not only acts as a mediator in the transaction and coordinates the work of all parties involved, but also makes the sale competitive. The advisor’s job is to find multiple potential buyers. Healthy competition always benefits the seller and adds value to his asset.

7. Superficial discussion of provisions for additional payments subject to future earnings.

Shareholders of the selling company can collect additional payment(s) (so called earn-outs) after the transaction closes, depending on financial performance or the achievement of certain milestones. This is one method of dealing competently with a dispute over valuation differences between the seller and the buyer. But for the process of obtaining such payments to be painless, the key points of the agreement must be carefully drafted.

Image by freepik

Vous pouvez aussi aimer

qualinx logo

Congratulations to Qualinx B.V. on Raising €20 Million from Dutch Investors

The TD Shepherd team is happy to congratulate the Qualinx B.V. team on successfully raising €20 million from Dutch investors. TD Shepherd has provided strategic support to Qualinx over the years (starting in 2018), witnessing each step of their journey; their growth and success, makes us truly proud of their outstanding achievements.

Lire plus
illustration showing corporate collablrations

Corporate Collaborations: Your Lifeline Through the Valley of Death

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about surviving the Valley of Death in deep tech, it’s this: don’t go it alone. This stage is all about leveraging relationships, and corporate partnerships can be your most valuable lifeline. The key is to think beyond customers.

Lire plus
Minimalist illustration of an R&D laboratory partially obscured by thick fog, with lab equipment like a microscope, test tubes, and a flask in the foreground and an ‘R&D’ building fading into the mist, symbolizing uncertainty and the early, unclear stages of deep tech development.

The Deep Tech ‘Valley of Death’

The so-called “Valley of Death” in deep tech isn’t just about running out of cash—it’s about navigating a period where expectations clash with reality. Investors want to see traction, but your tech isn’t market-ready. Customers are intrigued, but they’re not ready to commit. And your R&D costs? They’re still burning through cash like it’s a bonfire.

Lire plus