The Art of Semiconductor Design Services: Starting

a graphics showing essential parts for design services company

In the previous article (https://www.tdshepherd.com/the-art-of-services-foundation-strategy/) we explained that design services companies often start as a spin-off from universities: Masters and/or PhD students research next generation semiconductor functions and, upon publications of their work (thank you IEEE), they get approached by companies interested in incorporating the new technology into their product roadmap. Sometimes this results in a hire, sometimes the engineer in question decides he/she would like to remain independent and start a business, usually taking along a few fellow students. Incubators [attached to the university] should have a keen interest in such design services companies. Often, such incubators look for VC-driven startups, startups with focus on products and hence offering a solid multiple on their investment. Design services companies do not attract venture capital because they don’t offer the multiples required by such funds. However, design services companies are essential ingredients of a healthy eco-system and, often enough, also function as a springboard for the next fabless semiconductor product company.

What is important for a starting design services company to look for when incorporating?

Following are key parts of the setup:

(1) at least one customer contract that will cover you for the next 9 to 12 months (financial continuity);

(2) an established strategy, market and customer segmentation (compass and route);

(3) at least a team of three to five dedicated engineers (critical mass);

(4) access to EDA tools (probably the most expensive part of your setup)

(5) transfer of patents and patent applications from the university to the newly founded company (freedom to operate);

(6) knowledgeable CFO as a part-time MT member (proper financial management and strategy).

Of course, there are more parts to consider but the six listed are key boxes to tick. Over our time as corporate strategy advisors we have seen and are seeing a lot of different companies in the service business, as growth companies looking for acquisition targets, as potential acquisition targets or as companies we advise as part of their long-term strategy. Ensuring a proper foundation is key to building a solid house.

 

Includes image by freepik

You may also like

the scheme showing the difference between capEx and opEx

CapEx vs. OpEx Explained Like You’re Five (But Building a Robot Company)

Imagine you’re building a robot. Not just any robot. Your robot. It’s smart, shiny, and meant to change the world. But before you bring it to life, you face a serious question: “Do I buy the robot factory, or just rent a workshop?” That’s where the magical world of CapEx and OpEx begins.

Read more
The scheme showing the pros and cons of VC versus CVC

CVC vs. VC: Pros and Cons for Founders

When you’re building a startup, the kind of funding you choose can determine the path your company takes. Two common funding options usually come into play: Venture Capital (VC) and Corporate Venture Capital (CVC).  

Read more
logos of TD Shepherd and Innoseis

Innoseis Sensor Technologies Has Closed a Seed Round

TD Shepherd congratulates the Innoseis Sensor Technologies’ team on closing of their Seed round led by FORWARD.one. Innoseis ST is a spin-off from the Nikhef who transferring advanced research in gravitational-wave detection into commercial sensor technology. 

Read more