A poorly structured deal can lead to unexpected tax burdens, reducing the overall value for both buyers and sellers. Here are some key tax factors to keep in mind:
One of the biggest tax decisions in M&A is whether to structure the deal as an asset sale or a stock sale. In an asset sale, the buyer benefits from a “step-up” in the tax basis of the acquired assets, which can lead to tax savings through future depreciation. But for sellers, this often means paying higher taxes on capital gains and ordinary income. In contrast, stock sales are typically more favorable for sellers, as they are taxed at lower capital gains rates, though buyers miss out on those depreciation advantages.
The structure of the transaction—whether it is taxable or tax-deferred—can dramatically impact taxes. For example, a tax-deferred structure (like a 1031 exchange in the U.S.) allows sellers to defer capital gains taxes, making it an attractive option. However, these structures require meeting specific criteria, but not every deal qualifies.
If a buyer assumes the target company’s debt, it can have important tax consequences. While interest on that debt is usually tax-deductible, there are limits on how much can be deducted. Buyers should weigh these tax benefits carefully against potential risks.
International M&A adds another layer of complexity. Different tax laws across jurisdictions mean that buyers and sellers need to navigate a maze of rules to avoid double taxation or ensure tax efficiency. Failing to plan for this can result in higher costs and compliance issues later.
By understanding how different structures impact taxes, you can negotiate smarter and achieve better outcomes for all parties involved.
AI helped shape this, but the ideas remain human at heart.
Includes image by freepik
Generating infrared light isn’t difficult. But generating it on a chip — reliably, efficiently, and compactly — is a different story. Traditional IR sources rely on heating elements. They radiate across a wide range of wavelengths, consume significant power, and require filters to isolate the signals. Manageable in labs, unworkable in wearables.
Innovation tends to follow a familiar path: first, we invent something powerful. Then we shrink it. Only then does it become an everyday part of the infrastructure. But one layer is still missing in today’s technology: sensing beyond the visible.
The journey from concept to market looks very different in traditional tech compared to deep tech. While traditional tech benefits from streamlined processes and quicker iteration, deep tech ventures face longer, more complex cycles due to the groundbreaking nature of their innovations.