An article recently published online with the title “Europe needs more scientists in VC to become a deeptech powerhouse – Tech.eu” highlights the fact that the problem deep-tech startups are facing is still not widely understood. A good understanding of the problem a deep-tech startup addresses with its technology can be mediated by a better process within the startup (a significant part of our—TD Shepherd—work is to “format” a startup’s focus into a story the outside world can understand, connect with and “own”). Therefore, the real problem is not solved by bringing more scientists into the VC teams—they would quickly lose their skills and signify a loss to the engineering community. What the deep-tech startups do need are venture funds with a significantly longer lifetime and deeper pockets – it is as simple as that. The availability of sufficient venture capital over the lifetime of a deep-tech startup (for instance, a fabless semicon startup will, on average, exit after ten years and a total investment of € 50-60M). While the availability of seed/early-stage capital is becoming easier (although the amounts remain (significantly) lower as compared to the USA), the later-stage rounds are increasingly difficult for EU-based deep-tech startups. That is where the real problem is located, not the lack of scientists in the VC community.
Image generated using AI
The path to innovation is laden with unique and often substantial cost drivers that set these ventures apart from their more conventional counterparts. To handle these costs effectively, you need to understand them clearly and plan your finances and resources carefully.
At a later stage we will provide a series of postings on how to build and maintain your company’s dashboard. Most importantly, we cover how to use it. The most eloquent dashboard does no good if it is not properly used.
As a Management Team, you need to make the dashboard the central point of engagement.
If your startup is getting acquisition interest, congratulations! But should you sell to a private equity firm or a strategic buyer? Private equity (PE) firms and strategic buyers have fundamentally different financial approaches to M&A. This is because of their contrasting goals, investment strategies, and operational priorities.